Articles

Articles

04. Dec. 2023 Pro Bono & Human Rights

The right to apply for asylum in South Africa


The Constitutional Court (CC) recently handed down an important judgment which speaks to the right to apply for asylum in South Africa. Over the past several years, we have seen more and more anti-foreign national rhetoric in the public domain, with even high-ranking government officials contributing to the narrative that foreign nationals are the cause of many of South Africa’s issues. This has resulted in a continuingly shrinking safe space for foreign nationals who intend on seeking refuge in the country. Given our current socio-political climate, this judgment comes at a critical time where the rights of vulnerable people must be protected, in line with our international and domestic obligations.
At a glance
• The Constitutional Court (CC) recently handed down an important judgment which speaks to the right to apply for asylum in South Africa.
• The central issue in the case was the applicant’s right to apply for asylum, after being in the South Africa, unlawfully, for over a year.
• The applicant sought an order prohibiting the respondents from deporting him until his status under the Refugees Act 130 of 1998.
The matter of Ashebo v Minister of Home Affairs and Others (CCT 250/22) [2023] ZACC 16 was a direct urgent application to the CC, after the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria (High Court) struck the applicant’s application from the roll for lack of urgency. The central issue in this case was the applicant’s right to apply for asylum in South Africa, after being in the country unlawfully for over a year. The applicant sought an order prohibiting the respondents from deporting him until his status under the Refugees Act 130 of 1998 (Refugees Act) had been lawfully determined; declaring his continued detention unlawful and for him to be immediately released; and that he be entitled to remain in the country for a period of 14 days in order for him to apply for asylum at a Refugee Reception Office (RRO). He sought further relief which required the respondents to accept his application for asylum and issue him with a temporary asylum seeker permit.
Background
The applicant entered the country, clandestinely, on 11 June 2021. He fled his home country (Ethiopia) due to political and religious persecution. On 7 July 2022 he was arrested for entering and residing in the country unlawfully. Despite the applicant advising the detention officer that he was in the country to seek refuge, and that he had tried on numerous occasions to apply for asylum, the detention officer would not accept this and contented that the applicant was only in the country for economic reasons.
In the High Court, the respondents argued that the matter was not urgent, and that the applicant could not claim he was entitled to apply for asylum when he had already been in the country for more than a year. The presiding officer was of the view that the urgency had been self-created and found the applicant’s version of events unbelievable, contradictory and inconsistent, and struck the matter from the roll with a costs order against the applicant.
The CC thus had to decide whether the matter was indeed urgent before it could deal with the merits of the case. In this regard, it considered the consequences of not granting urgency and noted the respondent’s argument that the matter was not urgent, and that due course should be followed in the High Court, but it concluded that given that the applicant was awaiting imminent conviction and deportation, the application had to be considered urgent. And even though there was no conviction or deportation date set, the applicant would suffer great prejudice if the matter was not heard urgently, whereas the respondents would not suffer any prejudice if the matter were to be heard.
Intention to apply for asylum
The applicant, in the CC, argued that he should be regulated by the Refugees Act and not the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 (Immigration Act) ` this is because section 23 of the Immigration Act requires that any person wanting to apply for asylum must make use of the Refugees Act. The applicant therefore relied on section 2 and section 21(1)(a), read together with Regulation 8(1)(a) and (3) of the Refugees Act ` these provisions provide for the application process and envisage two requirements to be met; first, an asylum seeker is required to attend at an RRO within five days to make their application, and second, the application must be made in person. As mentioned before, the applicant tried to apply for asylum before his arrest, however, he was unbale to do so due to the RRO being closed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time the case was heard, he was also unable to make his application in person, due to him being in detention. The applicant further argued that the requirements were irrational, unconstitutional and invalid in his case as they did not facilitate applying for asylum in a meaningful manner and that he should not be in detention as his arrest was not justified under the Immigration Act, the Refugees Act or the Constitution.
Before the matter was heard the respondents withdrew their notice of opposition and filed a notice to abide. The CC thus directed the parties to file written submissions to address whether the applicant was entitled to be released from detention, after expressing an intention to make an application for asylum given the recent judgment of Shanko v Minister of Home Affairs: Shambu v Minister of Home Affairs: Bogala v Minister of Home Affairs [2021] ZAGPJHC 857 ` this matter concerned three individuals who were held in detention, despite them expressing their intention to apply for asylum. The High Court ordered that all reasonable steps be taken to give effect to the applicants’ intention to apply for asylum, but it refused to order their release during the process. Shanko was recently overturned by the Full Court of its Division.
Submissions
In response to the question posed by the CC, the applicant made the following submissions:
• The Constitution, in section 12, guaranteed him both substantive and procedural protection, which requires the state to have sound reasons for depriving him of his freedom and the deprivation must accord with fair procedures and, further, in section 7(2), the state is required to protect, respect and promote the Bill of Rights.
• A case had been made out for refugee status in accordance with Article 31(1) of the 1951 United National Convention relating to the State of Refugees, and his further detention would constitute a penalty in terms of the article.
• The threat of deportation violated the principle of non-refoulment, and his application had not been adjudicated, as is required.
• The CC was required by Regulation 8(4) to come to his rescue and order his release in order for him to apply for asylum.
The respondents in their submission re-iterated that the matter was not urgent and that it should be re-enrolled on the ordinary High Court roll, as there was no evidence that the matter could not be dispensed with timeously under the ordinary court procedures. They further contended that it is necessary that applications for asylum be brought within a reasonable time period after an individual enters a country, to do otherwise would render the Immigration Act an empty vessel, as any foreigner who is detained after being in the country for an extended time, can make assertions that they intend on applying for asylum.
The CC’s considerations
The CC therefore in turn had two critical issues to consider, the first is the time afforded to an illegal foreigner to apply for asylum and the second, is whether an illegal foreigner is entitled to be released from detention, after expressing an intention to seek asylum while awaiting deportation until their application has been finalised.
As to the first issue, the CC already considered the issue in two other CC cases, namely: Ruta v Minister of Home Affairs (CCT02/18) [2018] ZACC 52; 2019 (3) BCLR 383 (CC); 2019 (2) SA 329 (CC) and Abore v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (CCT 115/21) [2021] ZACC 50; 2022 (4) BCLR 387 (CC); 2022 (2) SA 321 (CC) (30 December 2021). In both these matters the CC established that once an illegal foreigner has indicated their intention to apply for asylum, they must be afforded an opportunity to do so and further, that a delay in expressing that intention does not bar the individual from applying. It held that even though a delay in applying for asylum is significant in determining an individual’s credibility and authenticity, it does not “function as an absolute disqualification from initiating the asylum application process”. Thus, until an applicant’s application has been finally adjudicated, the principle of non-refoulement protects the applicant from deportation.
In considering the second issue, the CC analysed the current legislative framework, which was amended after Ruta was handed down. It specifically looked at the extent to which the provisions relating to the asylum process have been amended. An important consideration was the fact that the previous regulations made provision for an illegal foreigner, who intended on applying for asylum, to be temporarily released pending the making of the application ` this does not exist in the current framework. Instead, the amended Regulation 7, which deals with asylum transit visas, imposes more stringent conditions and requires that the individual declare their intention to apply for asylum at the port of entry. Once they have expressed their intention, their biometrics must be provided, together with other relevant data, and only then would they be eligible to be issued with an asylum transit visa for five days. Similarly, Regulation 8 is also quite strict as it requires a person who does not have an asylum transit visa to show good cause, when attending at an RRO, for entering the country illegally. The CC concluded that the combined effect of the amended provisions is to provide an illegal foreigner who intends on applying for asylum but who did not arrive at a port of entry and express their interest there, with a method to demonstrate the intention even after the five-day period. The CC held that this applied to the applicant’s case, the applicant admittedly entered the country illegally and when he tried to apply for asylum, the RROs were closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. “These facts form a basis for him to show good cause as required by law. The door is not closed to an application for asylum.”
While the CC concluded that the current legal framework allows individuals to apply for asylum without an asylum transit visa, it still had to determine whether it is lawful to detain an illegal foreigner during the process of establishing whether there was good cause and where an actual application for asylum is yet to occur.
The CC noted that while an illegal foreigner is still entitled to apply for asylum, it does not negate the fact that they have contravened the Immigration Act ` in this regard it is important to establish under which provision the individual was charged. Sections 34 and 49 of the Immigration Act both regulate illegal entry and stay by non-South African citizens, however, they each have a distinct purpose. Section 34 is generally used for deportation purposes, whereas section 49 criminalises certain conduct.
The question that arose, irrespective of the charge, was whether the applicant’s expression of an intention to apply for asylum entitled him to be released from detention. To this, the CC answered, no. The CC determined that if they were to accept the applicant’s argument that he was entitled to be released pending his asylum application, it would create a practical challenge that would result in any illegal foreigner in immigration detention having to be released once they’ve declared their intention to apply for asylum ` this was not a tenable situation. There is therefore no automatic right which entitles an illegal immigrant to be released from prison once they have declared their intention to apply for asylum ` however, where the individual does express such an intention while in detention, the Department of Home Affairs must take all reasonable steps to facilitate the process of the application being made.
The CC accordingly upheld the appeal and the application for leave to direct appeal and ordered the applicant to not be deported until he has had an opportunity to show good cause in terms of the Refugees Act, and if good cause is shown, until his application for asylum has been finally determined. The respondents were ordered to take all reasonable steps, within 14 days, to allow the applicant to apply for asylum, failing which, the applicant is to be released from detention unless he may lawfully be detained under the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977



V.5100
23. Feb. 2024 SABC news

SCA dismisses Motsoaledi’s bid to appeal ZEP ruling

Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi has suffered a blow in his bid to appeal the judgment of the High Court Pretoria. The court had invalidated his December 2021 decision to terminate the Zimbabwean Exemption Permit (ZEP) and an interim interdict, which stopped government from detaining or deporting any holder of the permit. Motsoaledi turned to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Bloemfontein in November last year to appeal the judgments, which he argued had set a dangerous precedent. V.5203

Click here for full article
23. Feb. 2024 Businesstec

Disky, The Top-Rated WhatsApp Licence Renewal Service in South Africa

Disky stands out as the premier choice for South Africans seeking a hassle-free vehicle licence disc renewal, and its outstanding online reviews speak volumes. Click here to renew your vehicle licence disc with Disky. Customers on the renowned review platform HelloPeter have awarded Disky an impressive rating of 4.03/5 from over 250 reviews. This rating is particularly noteworthy, considering HelloPeter users` reputation for being discerning and critical of businesses on the platform. Disky has garnered love from HelloPeter users due to its simplicity and efficiency. The renewal application is completed over WhatsApp and typically takes less than seven minutes. What`s more, this service is available across all nine provinces in South Africa, and users are not required to create an account. V.5204

Click here for full article
23. Feb. 2024 The Citizen

Motsoaledi Urges Action Against Employers of Illegal Foreigners

Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi advocates for stricter measures against business owners knowingly employing undocumented foreigners. Motsoaledi, in collaboration with Eastern Cape Premier Oscar Mabuyane, addressed stakeholders in Gqeberha during a service delivery monitoring session. Following a request from the provincial government, Home Affairs deployed mobile trucks to assist citizens in obtaining documents. Motsoaledi calls for sanctions against employers of undocumented foreigners, proposing by-laws to prevent them from operating businesses. He emphasizes the importance of parents registering their children to prevent cases like that of Thabo Bester. V.5206

Click here for full article
23. Feb. 2024 News24

Motsoaledi`s bid to appeal Zimbabwean permits ruling dismissed in court accreditation

The Zimbabwean Exemption Permit programme will not end any time soon, following a Supreme Court of Appeal dismissal of the Minister of Home Affairs` request for leave to appeal. The Zimbabwean Exemption Permit programme will not end any time soon, following a Supreme Court of Appeal dismissal of the Minister of Home Affairs` request for leave to appeal. The Supreme Court of Appeal has dismissed a bid by the Minister of Home Affairs to appeal a ruling that the termination of the ZEP programme was unlawful, unconstitutional and invalid. The court ruled there were no reasonable prospects of success. Last year, the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria ordered Minister Aaron Motsoaledi to reconsider the termination of the programme following a fair, consultative process that complied with the relevant laws. V.5207

Click here for full article
22. Feb. 2024 The Citizen

Motsoaledi Calls for Action Against Those Who Knowingly Employ Illegal Foreigners

Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi has advocated for stricter measures against business owners knowingly employing undocumented foreigners. During a stakeholder engagement and service delivery monitoring session in Gqeberha, Motsoaledi, along with Eastern Cape Premier Oscar Mabuyane, called for sanctions such as imprisonment or fines for guilty employers. The department had dispatched mobile Home Affairs trucks to assist citizens in obtaining their documents, responding to requests from the provincial government. Motsoaledi suggested implementing by-laws to prevent businesses operated by those who employ undocumented foreigners. He also urged parents to register their children to avoid situations like that of Thabo Bester. V.5202

Click here for full article
20. Feb. 2024 The Star

Asylum seekers, Newcomers be aware

People going to any Refugee Reception Centre in Cape Town , Gqeberha ( Port Elizabeth ) Marabastad Pretoria & Mesina know this if you never reported to border post to get an asylum transit visa when you go for the first interview for asylum you will be arrested if you don’t have this and you will be brought before a magistrate to explain why you never got it . If you cannot convince magistrate you will be deported Gauteng High Court rules in favour of Motsoaledi on detention of illegal immigrants V.5200

Click here for full article
14. Feb. 2024 iol

Gauteng High Court Rules in Favor of Motsoaledi on Detention of Illegal Immigrants

The Gauteng High Court in Johannesburg has ruled in favor of Home Affairs Minister Dr. Aaron Motsoaledi in response to an application by a group of illegal immigrants. The immigrants claimed that their detention at the Modderbee Correctional Services Centre in Benoni was unlawful and violated immigration and refugee acts. V.5199

Click here for full article
12. Feb. 2024 City Press

Weak rand a tourist magnet, as their dollars and pounds go much further than back home

The rand may have lost value against foreign currencies, but this makes South Africa an attractive tourist destination It`s probably not the prospect of cheap cappuccino in South Africa that attracts foreign tourists here, but it`s obviously welcome if your foreign currency gets you further. Mary Curtis, a strategist, and Andrea Masia, a senior economist, both associated with RMB Morgan Stanley. said: Consumers can easily drink three cappuccinos in South Africa for the price of one in America. You can also spend four nights in a Cape Town hotel for the same price as one night in London `In the bigger picture, the low relative prices of goods and services in South Africa are just another example of the value in South African assets.` V.5197

Click here for full article
12. Feb. 2024 The Conversation

SA must clean up the mess Motsoaledi has made at home affairs

This particular mess was triggered by Aaron Motsoaledi’s failure to amend an unconstitutional law that allowed for the detention of irregular migrants for 120 days. Legal grievances against the South African department of home affairs, including contempt of court cases, are depressingly common. Too frequently, the minister has to apologise to a court or ask for more time on behalf of the department. Most of the court cases involve the operations of the department regarding visas, and permits for foreign visitors, immigrants and prospective refugees. V.5198

Click here for full article
10. Feb. 2024 Businesstech

New laws for remote worker and critical skill visas in South Africa

The Department of Home Affairs has published the draft second amendment of the Immigration Regulations, which deals with two key categories of visas ` the remote working and critical skills visa ` and ancillary matters for public comment. The new regulations come after extensive lobbying by the Western Cape Government since 2021 for the introduction of a digital nomad visa and reforms to the visa regime to enable South Africa to attract skilled individuals to South Africa, to help develop and grow the economy. “To boost tourism, facilitate foreign investment, and allow digital nomads to work in South Africa, while spending their earnings here, we need to make it as easy as possible for them to access South Africa,” said WC MEC Mireille Wenger. V.5193

Click here for full article
10. Feb. 2024 IOL

Home Affairs is in need of a major clean-up

Legal grievances against the South African Department of Home Affairs, including contempt of court cases, are depressingly common. Too frequently the minister has to apologise to a court, or to ask for more time on behalf of the department. Most of the court cases involve the operations of the department regarding visas and permits for foreign visitors, immigrants and prospective refugees. Just a few months ago, Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi said in legal papers: “I would like to take this opportunity to extend my sincere apology to the Chief Justice, all judges of the high court and Constitutional Court, the President of South Africa, Minister of Finance, Lawyers for Human Rights and its legal representatives and the people of South Africa for the mess created by officials of the Department of Home Affairs V.5194

Click here for full article
10. Feb. 2024 Businesstech

Canada extends ban on foreigners buying property what it means for South African emigrants

Canada has extended its ban on foreigners buying residential property, but South Africans living in the North American country should not worry. In 2022, the Canadian government passed the Prohibition on the Purchase of Residential Property by the Non-Canadians Act to stop foreign investors from buying residential property in Canada. This was intended to ensure that Canadian citizens were not priced out of the housing market. Chrystia Freeland, the Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, said that the government now intends to extend the ban by an additional two years. The ban on foreign ownership of Canadian housing will thus be extended from January 1, 2025 to January 1, 2027. V.5195

Click here for full article
10. Feb. 2024 The South African

How to expedite a South African smart ID card application in 2024

Forget the ‘green mamba’ and say ‘howzit’ to expediting your South African smart ID card application online. A South African smart ID card application in 2024 has never been easier since the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) embraced digital technologies. If you need to expedite a smart ID card application, here’s what you need to do before wandering into a DHA branch and wasting everyone’s time. There are plenty of reasons you’ll want to speed up a smart ID card application. You may just be moeg of the ‘green mamba’ or perhaps your ID has been stolen or cloned and you need a new one. Whatever the case may be, you can speed up the smart ID card application process by going online first. Here’s what to do and how much it costs V.5196

Click here for full article
08. Feb. 2024 The Guardian

UK care firm charged workers from Africa thousands more than cost of visa

Zimbabweans say they paid large sums to Gloriavd Health Care but got far less work than expected and were squalidly housed A care company serving NHS patients has been charging migrant workers from Africa thousands of pounds to work in the UK when the cost of a visa is only a few hundred pounds, the Guardian has learned. Care workers from Zimbabwe were told to pay the sums to Gloriavd Health Care Ltd in return for arranging social care jobs in and around Leeds and Bath. They also claimed they were given far less paid work than they had been led to expect, were housed in overcrowded rooms and faced a threat that their conduct could be reported to the Home Office, leading them to fear deportation if they complained. One woman alleged she sold her home in rural South Africa to pay £6,500 in fees to the company operated by Gloria Van Dunem only to find she and her colleagues had so little work they had to rely on food banks. V.5192

Click here for full article
04. Feb. 2024 Daily Investor

Bank of America expects South Africa’s economic growth to triple in 2024

Bank of America expects South Africa’s economic growth to triple to 1.5% in 2024 from a paltry 0.5% in 2023. Sub-Saharan Africa economist at Bank of America, Tatonga Rusike, told CNBC Africa that this growth rate is nothing special and not good enough for the country. Rusike said 2024 will be a very tumultuous year for South Africa, with national elections, interest cuts expected in the second half, and deteriorating public finances. V.5190

Click here for full article
04. Feb. 2024

Foreigners are flooding to South Africa ` but we’re still playing catch-up

Tourist arrivals in South Africa have increased in recent years, but they are still far off pre-pandemic levels. According to Stats SA, in December 2023, 3.5 million travellers were recorded at South African ports of entry/exit, beating the 2.9 million seen in December 2022. The United Nations World Tourism Organisation (UNWTO) said that there were an estimated 1.3 billion international tourist arrivals in 2023, which is 88% of pre-pandemic levels. With worldwide tourism rebounding, South Africa is experiencing a similar trend. In 2021, the number of international tourist arrivals was 77.9% lower than the pre-pandemic levels of 2019, dropping from 10.23 million tourists in 2019 to 2.26 million in 2021. In 2022, this figure improved to approximately 5.70 million ` 44.3% lower than pre-pandemic levels. In 2023, tourist numbers stood at 8.48 million tourists in 2023 ` 17.1% below the pre-pandemic levels. V.5191

Click here for full article
02. Feb. 2024 The Street

A country just went visa-free for visitors with any passport

The president said that `it shall no longer be necessary for any person from any corner of the globe to carry the burden of applying for a visa.` As anyone who has traveled internationally will know, the passport one has will make it significantly easier or more difficult to visit certain countries. In 2023, Japan was taken over by Singapore for the status of the most powerful passport in the world. Citizens of the city-state can visit 192 of the world`s 227 countries and travel destinations without a visa while Germany, Italy and Spain tied for second place. The U.S., which was in first place in 2014, is curre. V.5156

Click here for full article
02. Feb. 2024 Le Monde

South Korea, the world`s lowest fertility rate sinks lower and lower

Researcher Sébastien Lechevalier reports on how the causes of declining fertility among Korean women vary from generation to generation. Falling birth rates affect most of the developed countries of East Asia and Europe, resulting in accelerated aging of the population. However, the scale of the phenomenon is greatest in South Korea. In 2021, the country`s total fertility rate (total amount of children per woman of childbearing age) was 0.81, compared with 1.16 in China, 1.19 in Spain, 1.25 in Italy, 1.3 in Japan, 1.58 in Germany and 1.8 in France. Most importantly, it`s a long-term situation: The fertility rate has been below 1.3 for two decades V.5189

Click here for full article
28. Jan. 2024 Businesstech

Big win for thousands of South Africans who lost their citizenship ` including those who didn’t even know

A law that strips South Africans of their citizenship is expected to be removed by the South African government. As per section 6(1) of the Citizenship Act, South Africans automatically lose their citizenship if they voluntarily obtain citizenship with another country. This is a continuation of an apartheid-era law. This law exists despite the Constitution stating that no South African may be stripped of their South African citizenship. Removing the right to citizenship also violates other rights enshrined in the Constitution, including the right to vote, the right to reside in South Africa, the right to stand for public office and the right to choose any occupation. Those who would like to retain their South African citizenship under the standing laws would need to apply to the Minster of Home Affairs to do so. V.5184

Click here for full article
28. Jan. 2024 Businesstech

Home Affairs is showing tourists in South Africa the door

Due to the backlog and long turnaround time for visas processed by the Department of Home Affairs (DHA), some tourists have been advised to leave the country by the end of February. The DHA issued a directive on 21 December 2023 that will require tourists who wish to extend their stay in South Africa to leave the country by 29 February 2024. According the Democratic Alliance, this will do incredible damage to the country’s tourism industry, as any visitors who wished to extend their stay over a busy holiday season would now be denied ` all because of the department’s backlog. “Tourists, when entering South Africa, can be issued with a 90-day visa and subsequently apply for a 90-day extension if they wish to stay longer. “South Africa stands to lose millions in lost revenue by not allowing them to extend their visas during the busiest season,” said DA MP Angel Khanyile. V.5185

Click here for full article

Visa Categories

Head Office

Cape Town, Tel : +27 (0) 82 373 8415

South Africa , Tel : +27 (0) 74 036 6127

Email : info@sami.co.za

Download Brochure About South Africa

Articles

23. Feb. 2024 SABC news

SCA dismisses Motsoaledi’s bid to appeal ZEP ruling

Home Affairs Minister Aaron Motsoaledi has suffered a blow in his bid to appeal the judgment of the High Court Pretoria. The court had invalidated his December 2021 decision to terminate the Zimbabwean Exemption Permit (ZEP) and an interim interdict, which stopped government from detaining or deporting any holder of the permit. Motsoaledi turned to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) in Bloemfontein in November last year to appeal the judgments, which he argued had set a dangerous precedent. V.5203

Click here for full article

Testimonials

Testimonials are the best way we can show how satisfied our clients are with us and they are our best advertisement. Just look what our clients have to say about SAMI!

"This is so great, I have now been out and gotten us not only one but two bottles of Graham Beck! At least one of the glasses will be drunk as a salute to you and Rod and everyone else at SAMI!

Thank you so much for all your help, your help has really been more than invaluable to us!"

Jennifer and Jimmy Wahlberg - Sweden
Read More

Free Newsletters

Newsletters are always the best way to keep our clients informed of the rapid changes in the immigration world and we can update you in this regard by you subscribing to our free newsletter.

SAMI issues a monthly Newsletter to update you on topical immigration and related matters that we believe you should be aware of especially with regard to the procedures and rules pertaining thereto. These newsletters will provide you with useful information on any aspect of life related to immigration and relocation. If you are interested in a visa or just to visit you should subscribe to the Free Newsletter service of SAMI.

Enhance your knowledge
Get Subscription